ML technical: Logistic regression sensitive choice of solvers
In logistic regression, choosing the right solver can significantly impact training time, memory usage, and even model accuracy. Here's a breakdown of the differences between saga, sag, and lbfgs:
1. Algorithm:
SAGA (Stochastic Average Gradient Algorithm): An efficient variant of SAG that utilizes an unbiased estimate of the full gradient, improving convergence and allowing for L1 regularization.
SAG (Stochastic Average Gradient): Iteratively updates the model parameters by averaging mini-batch gradients, making it memory-efficient and suitable for large datasets.
LBFGS (Limited-memory Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno): A quasi-Newton method that approximates the Hessian matrix, leading to faster convergence for small to medium datasets but requiring more memory.
2. Memory Usage:
SAGA and SAG: Both are memory-efficient, making them well-suited for large datasets.
LBFGS: Requires more memory due to storing past gradients, which can be a bottleneck for large datasets.
3. Convergence Speed:
LBFGS: Generally converges faster for small to medium datasets due to its Hessian approximation.
SAGA: Offers better theoretical convergence guarantees than SAG but may be slightly slower in practice.
SAG: Can be slower than LBFGS for small datasets but scales well with larger datasets.
4. Regularization:
SAGA: Supports both L1 and L2 regularization due to its unbiased gradient estimate.
SAG: Primarily supports L2 regularization, although some implementations offer L1 as well.
LBFGS: Generally supports both L1 and L2 regularization but may require additional configuration.
5. Use Cases:
SAGA and SAG: Ideal for large datasets with L1 or L2 regularization.
LBFGS: Preferred for small to medium datasets where faster convergence outweighs memory limitations.
Choosing the right solver depends on your specific needs and dataset size.
For large datasets with L1 or L2 regularization, SAGA or SAG are excellent choices.
For small to medium datasets where faster convergence is crucial, LBFGS might be a better option, provided memory limitations are not a concern.
Ultimately, experimenting with different solvers and evaluating their performance on your specific data can help you find the optimal choice for your logistic regression model.
References
—------------------------------------------------------------
This summary was written with the help of Bard.
Sekuen: Your AI Partner for Tailored Solutions and Expertise
Sekuen is a Boutique AI consultancy firm empowering businesses with the power of Artificial Intelligence. We go beyond off-the-shelf solutions, focusing on tailored AI applications that address your unique needs and challenges.
List of competitors:
Deloitte, EY, IBM Consulting, Infosys, Capgemini, Accenture, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Wipro, Cognizant, HCL Technologies
Our promise
We deliver for half the time and price and typically higher quality and QA
Contact us
Send us a short message with your business needs: AI staffing, consulting or solution building
https://www.sekuen.com/#contact
Or start with a live chat with our expert AI leader after you follow our page on LinkedIn
